<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 0.2.7-RC3 release</title>
	<link>http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/blog/?p=47</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 02:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: greenFrog</title>
		<link>http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/blog/?p=47#comment-23928</link>
		<dc:creator>greenFrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 07:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/blog/?p=47#comment-23928</guid>
		<description>marco Says: 

May 1st, 2007 at 2:02 am 
The previous problem that I start my lab on the 3640 router, which is c3640-ik9o3s-mz.124-7.extracted.bin. I type the â€œcopy run startâ€? command and exit the router and dynagen. However, I cannot control the router (Cannot the type any command, no response, the router hang!!!)after I started the lab again. 

But I notice that the clock is incorrect and a message â€œ% Error! No serial number found for this platform.â€? is shown during boot up but the clock is correct on any other platform. 

Is it a bug ? Does this problem crash the router itself?
================================================

I also encounter this error when I start a router.  the error message is follow: 

â€œ% Error! No serial number found for this platform.â€?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marco Says: </p>
<p>May 1st, 2007 at 2:02 am<br />
The previous problem that I start my lab on the 3640 router, which is c3640-ik9o3s-mz.124-7.extracted.bin. I type the â€œcopy run startâ€? command and exit the router and dynagen. However, I cannot control the router (Cannot the type any command, no response, the router hang!!!)after I started the lab again. </p>
<p>But I notice that the clock is incorrect and a message â€œ% Error! No serial number found for this platform.â€? is shown during boot up but the clock is correct on any other platform. </p>
<p>Is it a bug ? Does this problem crash the router itself?<br />
================================================</p>
<p>I also encounter this error when I start a router.  the error message is follow: </p>
<p>â€œ% Error! No serial number found for this platform.â€?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: breeze1974</title>
		<link>http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/blog/?p=47#comment-12533</link>
		<dc:creator>breeze1974</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/blog/?p=47#comment-12533</guid>
		<description>GREAT PROGRAM !!!!!!!
Will there be support on the next version for voice ???
Would really help me....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GREAT PROGRAM !!!!!!!<br />
Will there be support on the next version for voice ???<br />
Would really help me&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/blog/?p=47#comment-10635</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 15:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/blog/?p=47#comment-10635</guid>
		<description>Adrian&#62; Hm, I hadn't thought of that ... I'll look into a newer version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adrian&gt; Hm, I hadn&#8217;t thought of that &#8230; I&#8217;ll look into a newer version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/blog/?p=47#comment-10551</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 05:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/blog/?p=47#comment-10551</guid>
		<description>I found that one side ignored the config and said â€˜Half-Duplexâ€™. I had to go into config mode on the offending router and first perform a â€˜duplex halfâ€™ and then â€˜duplex fullâ€™ â€¦ merely typing â€˜duplex fullâ€™ under the interface again did nothing to resolve the issue. Looks like a BUG to me.

 Might be a silly thing but  have you tried using a later IOS version? Could be a bug in the IOS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found that one side ignored the config and said â€˜Half-Duplexâ€™. I had to go into config mode on the offending router and first perform a â€˜duplex halfâ€™ and then â€˜duplex fullâ€™ â€¦ merely typing â€˜duplex fullâ€™ under the interface again did nothing to resolve the issue. Looks like a BUG to me.</p>
<p> Might be a silly thing but  have you tried using a later IOS version? Could be a bug in the IOS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/blog/?p=47#comment-10516</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 18:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/blog/?p=47#comment-10516</guid>
		<description>jancyk&#62; I actually encountered the problem you described. On restart of a lab I started receiving duplex-mismatch errors between two etherswitch modules. Within the configs on both 3600's, the ports were set to 100Mbps Full-Duplex, but upon performing a 'show interface' on both routers, I found that one side ignored the config and said 'Half-Duplex'. I had to go into config mode on the offending router and first perform a 'duplex half' and then 'duplex full' ... merely typing 'duplex full' under the interface again did nothing to resolve the issue. Looks like a BUG to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jancyk&gt; I actually encountered the problem you described. On restart of a lab I started receiving duplex-mismatch errors between two etherswitch modules. Within the configs on both 3600&#8217;s, the ports were set to 100Mbps Full-Duplex, but upon performing a &#8217;show interface&#8217; on both routers, I found that one side ignored the config and said &#8216;Half-Duplex&#8217;. I had to go into config mode on the offending router and first perform a &#8216;duplex half&#8217; and then &#8216;duplex full&#8217; &#8230; merely typing &#8216;duplex full&#8217; under the interface again did nothing to resolve the issue. Looks like a BUG to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Sanz</title>
		<link>http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/blog/?p=47#comment-10515</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Sanz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 18:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/blog/?p=47#comment-10515</guid>
		<description>Hello:

I'm study for CCVP and I need a card E1 or T1, but this interface doesn't emulate in dynagen. When is posible have a this card?. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m study for CCVP and I need a card E1 or T1, but this interface doesn&#8217;t emulate in dynagen. When is posible have a this card?. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/blog/?p=47#comment-10510</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 12:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/blog/?p=47#comment-10510</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,

Thanks alot for your great efforts. You did a great favor for networking people.
I have a question, Do you have any plan to emulate juniper routers as well ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>Thanks alot for your great efforts. You did a great favor for networking people.<br />
I have a question, Do you have any plan to emulate juniper routers as well ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carth</title>
		<link>http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/blog/?p=47#comment-10491</link>
		<dc:creator>carth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 17:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/blog/?p=47#comment-10491</guid>
		<description>Mark,


Thanks for the detail explanation and for your time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>Thanks for the detail explanation and for your time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Zhan</title>
		<link>http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/blog/?p=47#comment-10483</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Zhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 12:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/blog/?p=47#comment-10483</guid>
		<description>Thanks!!!!!Kris, You have done a great job!!! thanks very much!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!!!!!Kris, You have done a great job!!! thanks very much!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/blog/?p=47#comment-10450</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 11:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/blog/?p=47#comment-10450</guid>
		<description>Well ... I should add I don't recall actually trying to trunk out my bound NIC, but I can't imagine a problem - it's only an 802.1Q header on normal packets passed over a native VLAN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well &#8230; I should add I don&#8217;t recall actually trying to trunk out my bound NIC, but I can&#8217;t imagine a problem - it&#8217;s only an 802.1Q header on normal packets passed over a native VLAN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
